All the Money in the World | 25th of December, 2017 | Wahlberg's gotta get paid

[aabattery]

1 minute ago, Chewy said:

Christopher Plummer >>>> Thanos

 

The Plummer CGI really is way ahead of the competition.

[MrGamer]

Just now, ReyReyBattery said:

 

The Plummer CGI is really way ahead of the competition.

Andy Serkis now has competition for best motion capture performance of the year.  

[aabattery]

1 hour ago, KC7 said:

Good ad, though again, what is that accent Michelle Williams is doing? I'm not sure I could sit through 2 hours of that.

 

New character one-sheets, including one for Plummer

 

 

Plus an interview with Ridley about the recast:

http://ew.com/movies/2017/11/29/ridley-scott-kevin-spacey-all-the-money-in-the-world-exclusive/
 

 

 

You cut out the best part:

 

Quote

What was the studio’s reaction to all this?
They were like, “You’ll never do it. God be with you.” [Laughs]

But they’re holding the date of Dec. 22 for you anyway. 
F—ing right.

 

[Chewy]

For real though Ridley really did it, in like 2 weeks. lmao

[ecstasy]

Christopher Plummer is better than Spacey anyway.

 

I was just watching Nicholas Nickleby and he can be a ruthless SOB.

 

 

[RandomCat]

Ridley needs Best Director for this. If this shit is seemless when this comes out the 22nd, I don't give a fuck, best editing/best director for this movie.

[Jake Gittes]

If Ridley were around in the classic Hollywood studio system he'd be cranking out a half-dozen pictures a year with the best of them. 

[dudalb]

1 hour ago, Jake Gittes said:

If Ridley were around in the classic Hollywood studio system he'd be cranking out a half-dozen pictures a year with the best of them. 

He wouds give Michael Curtiz some competition is the "able to bring out two A quality film sin one year".

In 1938, Curtiz directed two films that have become classics: the Errol Flynn "Adventures of Robin Hood" and the classic Cagney/Bogart gangster film "Angels With Dirty Faces".

Speilberg is another director who can work at Golden age speed.

[Barnack]

2 minutes ago, dudalb said:

In 1938, Curtiz directed two films that have become classics: the Errol Flynn "Adventures of Robin Hood" and the classic Cagney/Bogart gangster film "Angels With Dirty Faces".

 

That Flynn movie had more than one director, I think lot of it was Keighley footage.

 

3 movie a year seem to have been the norm for heavy workload, 6 in the sound era, did even John Ford ever did that ?

[Jake Gittes]

5 minutes ago, Barnack said:

That Flynn movie had more than one director, I think lot of it was Keighley footage.

 

3 movie a year seem to have been the norm for heavy workload, 6 in the sound era, did even John Ford ever did that ?

Ford put out 4 in 1936. Two or three most other years. 

[Barnack]

1 minute ago, Jake Gittes said:

Ford put out 4 in 1936. Two or three most other years. 

Just a writer on last Outlaw I think:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Outlaw_(1936_film)

[Eric the IF]

 

[CoolioD1]

22 minutes ago, CoolEric258 said:

 

i was getting excited by all of ridley's fun switch up shenanigans that i almost forgot the actual movie looks quite bad.  

[Napoleon]

WB should have hired Ridley Scott for the JL reshoots.

[ecstasy]

6 minutes ago, CoolioD1 said:

i was getting excited by all of ridley's fun switch up shenanigans that i almost forgot the actual movie looks quite bad.  

I was so excited seeing Plummer in this that I had no idea Walberg was in the movie.

 

 

[AJG]

Yep. That’s certainly the worst trailer of year. Bass drops and quick cuts to cover up for the fact that not a damn thing is happening. Also People please retire that bloody old Kanye West song.

[MrGamer]

Yeah, that was a pretty bad trailer. I like how ruthless Plummer is as Getty, though. Should've just went with him to begin with instead of slapping make-up on Spacey. 

[Plain Old Tele]

Y'all crazy, that trailer was fine.

[grim22]

1 hour ago, CoolEric258 said:

 

If not for the controversy, this would have flopped hard. Now it will just flop less.

[dudalb]

1 hour ago, Barnack said:

That Flynn movie had more than one director, I think lot of it was Keighley footage.

 

3 movie a year seem to have been the norm for heavy workload, 6 in the sound era, did even John Ford ever did that ?

According to everything I have read, Warners was not happy with the Keighley footage,and brought in Curtiz to reshoot most of the film;the Directors Guild made the decision to give co director credit.

Almost all film historians  consider Robin Hood to be a Curtiz film,so I will   go along with that.

 

John Ford also managed to make  3 films that have stood the test to time in one year; in 1939 he did, "Stagecoach" "Young Mr.Lincoln" and "Drums Along the Mohawk".