filmlover Posted April 21, 2018 Share Posted April 21, 2018 If anything it's the multiplier that looks wonky. The first movie missed a 4.0 multiplier by a quite a bit over thirteen years ago (a lifetime in box office trends), and this one is bound to be a lot more frontloaded being a sequel. Finding Dory opened to $135M, which seems like an easy target for this. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasNicole Posted April 21, 2018 Share Posted April 21, 2018 3 minutes ago, filmlover said: If anything it's the multiplier that looks wonky. The first movie missed a 4.0 multiplier by a quite a bit over thirteen years ago (a lifetime in box office trends), and this one is bound to be a lot more frontloaded being a sequel. Finding Dory opened to $135M, which seems like an easy target for this. i'm thinking 3.5 - 3.6x multiplier, around Dory's multiplier [3,59x] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MovieMan89 Posted April 21, 2018 Share Posted April 21, 2018 If this lives up to the quality of Bird's other three animated films, I will say that I think he might be second only to Miyazaki among best animated feature directors. It will at least give him the edge for the time being over Stanton, Docter, and Unkrich among the Pixar crew. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royce Posted April 21, 2018 Share Posted April 21, 2018 Pretty good editing lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PNF2187 Posted April 21, 2018 Share Posted April 21, 2018 5 hours ago, filmlover said: If anything it's the multiplier that looks wonky. The first movie missed a 4.0 multiplier by a quite a bit over thirteen years ago (a lifetime in box office trends), and this one is bound to be a lot more frontloaded being a sequel. Finding Dory opened to $135M, which seems like an easy target for this. That 3.59 multiplier that they're predicting seems very unlikely given Pixar sequels are quite a bit less leggy than their predecessors while also almost always opening higher: Toy Story (6.58x) vs Toy Story 2 (4.28x) vs Toy Story 3 (3.76x) Monsters, Inc. (4.09x) vs Monsters University (3.26x) Finding Nemo (4.84x) vs Finding Dory (3.60x) Cars (4.06x) vs Cars 2 (2.89x) vs Cars 3 (2.85x) The Incredibles had a 3.71 multiplier, so this one will probably pull a multiplier in the low 3s. I don't see this one missing 3x so long as its reception isn't at the level of Brave/Monsters U or worse. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Loves Rey Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royce Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MovieMan89 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 (edited) This got the biggest trailer reaction by a mile at my IW screening tonight. Though I would have been shocked if it didn't. Edited April 27, 2018 by MovieMan89 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morieris Posted May 2, 2018 Share Posted May 2, 2018 Is this the first Pixar short to get merchandise? Either way, OMG *_* https://www.funko.com/blog/article/coming-soon-bao-vinyl-figure 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannastop Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 This is probably the only movie I'll watch this summer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmlover Posted May 8, 2018 Share Posted May 8, 2018 Tickets must be going on sale soon because my theater just posted a schedule for that weekend (first showing that Thursday is at 5 on the premium big screen). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LOGAN'sLuckyRun Posted May 9, 2018 Share Posted May 9, 2018 (edited) Incredibles 2 - Rated PG for action sequences and some brief mild language. https://filmratings.com/Content/Downloads/cara_rating_bulletin.pdf First Pixar film rated for language. I wonder if it's the C word. Edited May 9, 2018 by LOGAN'sLuckyRun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted May 9, 2018 Share Posted May 9, 2018 12 minutes ago, LOGAN'sLuckyRun said: Incredibles 2 - Rated PG for action sequences and some brief mild language. https://filmratings.com/Content/Downloads/cara_rating_bulletin.pdf First Pixar film rated for language. I wonder if it's the C word. Frozone is gonna drop a motherfucker 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LOGAN'sLuckyRun Posted May 9, 2018 Share Posted May 9, 2018 4 minutes ago, WrathOfHan said: Frozone is gonna drop a motherfucker YOU TELL ME WHERE MY SUIT IS, BITCH!!! 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YM! Posted May 9, 2018 Share Posted May 9, 2018 They dropped hell and crap in Ratatouille and it got a G. Don’t see the big deal. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Irskens Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 (edited) So while other sites like Fandango Regal and Cinemark, for example, are saying the movie is 118 Mins (1hr 58mins) others (as of today recently) are now saying it's 126 mins (2hrs 6mins) 2 Sites Like AMC https://www.amctheatres.com/movies/the-incredibles-2-49549 And Cineplex https://www.cineplex.com/Movie/incredibles-2?cmpid=NPCS_Home_Showtimes_ENG (Though it does say 125 mins - 2hrs 5mins) Does anyone know what the official Length of the movie is? (Regardless it is destined to be the longest Pixar film to date - which is a very good thing for us older fans of the first movie in 2004) Edited May 11, 2018 by Seth Irskens 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 On 5/8/2018 at 9:27 PM, YourMother the Edgelord said: They dropped hell and crap in Ratatouille and it got a G. Don’t see the big deal. They said "hell" in Cars as well. I remember being 12 and completely shocked by that. Though it's worth noting in the context the word is being used in the films it's alluding to Hell as a place, which isn't considered a swear. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mekanos Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 I don't remember "crap" in Ratatouille... when was that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ledmonkey96 Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 On 4/21/2018 at 12:46 PM, ThomasNicole said: I'll be happy if the movie does $ 395M dom, but i think it will do a little more Maybe $ 120M debut [i mean, it's the first big animated movie this year, is the only pixar sequel people really wanted, and the trailer views and social media is really huge for an animated movie], and a $ 420 - 435M total dom Worldwide i don't know what to expect, Coco exploded on China, Incredibles II have everything they appear to like, maybe a breakout could happen and push the worldwide number to + 1B I think it'll do better than Finding Dory since it has less competition. Heck FD didn't have much competition till a 4th week SLOP, and HT3 is not SLOP 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmlover Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 4 minutes ago, Ledmonkey96 said: I think it'll do better than Finding Dory since it has less competition. Heck FD didn't have much competition till a 4th week SLOP, and HT3 is not SLOP I wouldn't exactly call opening in the midst of no less than four potential $150M+ openers over a two month span "less competition." 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
