Goffe Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 like others here, I can't stop thinking about it. I have to watch a second time urgently. It's truly something else. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoolioD1 Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 The Matt Damon stuff really doesn't work for me. It felt like they were afraid they couldn't make a $200 million movie without having some sort of antagonist in there. Overall it's a neat experience though. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crusader Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 The Matt Damon stuff really doesn't work for me. It felt like they were afraid they couldn't make a $200 million movie without having some sort of antagonist in there. Overall it's a neat experience though. I've been thinking about this Would you say the Damon stuff ( when he 'turns bad' ) is the start of the 3rd act resolution or would you say that the black hole stuff is just the 3rd act Because tonally the movie had a clear change in the dynamic there ( a bit heavy handed IMO too ) and I thought that's where the 3rd act starts Some people disagree with this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#ED Posted November 8, 2014 Author Share Posted November 8, 2014 The father daughter relationship really gets to me. A tear jerk movie that's actually good. I might have to say I loved it better than Inception. 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rsyu Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 The Matt Damon stuff really doesn't work for me. It felt like they were afraid they couldn't make a $200 million movie without having some sort of antagonist in there. Overall it's a neat experience though. Matt Damon was worth it just for the shuttle docking scene. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CloneWars Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Saw this a second time. This is easily an A grade. Honestly, I was really let down by TDKR. So, I am glad that I like Interstellar. It's kind of funny seeing people have the opposite reaction who loved TDKR and yet are let down by Interstellar. Perhaps, the sign of a great director is when different people like and dislike your movies for different reasons. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AniNate Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Regardless of what you think of the end result, you have to admire Nolan's vision here. It's been a long time since the last big budget movie that just went into a total cerebral mindfuck in the last half hour. Personally, I loved it. There was never a moment I was bored through its near 3-hour runtime, and Matt, Anne, and Jessica were all terrific. Some absolutely beautiful visuals, the Gargantua entry being a standout. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CloneWars Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 I really hope to see more Nolan movies like this. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamKendall Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 (edited) Second viewing re-affirmed my A- and I could almost stretch it to an A, but A- feels right to me. * The awesome TARS * Hans Zimmer theme * The TRUE crushing realization that 23 years have passed in a matter of hours. * Hans Zimmer theme * A black hole, wormhole & waves of water hundreds and hundreds of feat high * Hans Zimmer theme * The moment Matt Damon actually blows up his shuttle and part of the Endurance. * Hans Zimmer theme * The realization that he was the ghost and the emotions that build up ... and you know you should have expected it earlier, but who cares. * Hans Zimmer theme * Dat typical Nolan amazing ending where you leave the theater feeling like you'd drive off a cliff if he asked you to. Feels good man. Edited November 8, 2014 by Adam 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redfirebird2008 Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 (edited) I've thought about it for 24 hours and it's in my top 3 Nolan movies with Memento and The Prestige. Could easily see Interstellar being revered as his greatest film in 30 years. Thank you Paramount and WB for having the courage to make this movie on such a big budget. A (9.5/10) Edited November 8, 2014 by redfirebird2008 16 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4815162342 Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 1st Act: Very good, very Spielbergian. 2nd Act: Pretty good, feels a bit messy at parts and has a couple moments I shook my head at for the artificially-induced character stupidity, but it overall worked very well 3rd Act: And here is where the film lost me. A visual treat and designed superbly, and technically all of its pieces fit together, but it simply just does not work for me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 What bothered you about the third act? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACCA Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Saw this a second time. This is easily an A grade. Honestly, I was really let down by TDKR. So, I am glad that I like Interstellar. It's kind of funny seeing people have the opposite reaction who loved TDKR and yet are let down by Interstellar. Perhaps, the sign of a great director is when different people like and dislike your movies for different reasons. I must be a real outlier then as I loved both TDKR and Interstellar. However Interstellar is hands down Nolan's best film in my mind. Better than any of the Batman films or Inception. Better than even Prestige and Memento for me. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4815162342 Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 What bothered you about the third act? It just did not gel together for me (like Mann's imperfect docking procedure with the Endurance). I loved the visuals and the design and setup was a treat, and everything about the physics and space-time made perfect sense, but I just couldn't buy into it because of how precise and calculating it was. Nolan tried to go for the emotional sucker punches in the most cold and clinical of ways. Compared to the emotional beats in the first act, which were totally earned and genuine, everything in the third act with Cooper and Murph just felt way too contorted to provide a very convenient answer to ensure Nolan got the payoff he wanted. And Cooper miraculously ending up deposited floating in orbit around Saturn at exactly the right time for him to get picked up so he can meet old Murph on her deathbed just in time for her to say okay I saw you now GTFO after 30 seconds just did not work. If it had actually been aliens consistently guiding and observing and very occasionally intervening, that would have tied things together a lot better than Nolan handwaving "it was us from the distant future creating a closed time loop" at the last possible second, because it makes things far harder to swallow with a perfect design lining everything up perfectly than the original alien concurrent premise. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4815162342 Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Shorter version, instead of the 2001 alien angle which would have tied in quite well with everything, Nolan gives us And it felt way too contorted and artificial to justify 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrPink Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Shorter version, instead of the 2001 alien angle which would have tied in quite well with everything, Nolan gives us And it felt way too contorted and artificial to justify Take my money Nolan 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozymandias Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 (edited) Well, I for one am glad it didn't lift the alien angle straight out of 2001. Edited November 8, 2014 by Ozymandias 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CloneWars Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Well, I for one am glad it didn't lift the alien angle straight out of 2001. Who knows? Now an argument can be made that the aliens in 2001 are actually 5-D beings and the space pilot who goes through the worm hole becomes the star child as a result of our intervention as 5-D beings and if it were not for the space pilot becoming the star child then the 5-D beings would never exist. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrPink Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Shorter version, instead of the 2001 alien angle which would have tied in quite well with everything, Nolan gives us And it felt way too contorted and artificial to justify In hindsight I should have said "AWSONOFABITCH" 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4815162342 Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Take my money Nolan You'll love it Pink. Expertly handled Nolansition, a William Devane cameo, Michael Caine giving a quasi-German accent, Hans Zimmer's Space Organ, Visual delights, and Nolan trying to make all the grown men cry Well, I for one am glad it didn't lift the alien angle straight out of 2001. I understand that. I think the finale definitely is hit-or-miss because it comes down to whether or not an individual completely buys into what Nolan is selling there. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...