Weekend Thread | Weekend Estimates: PP2 - $70.3M, MM:FR - $45.5M, TA2 - $38.84M

[boomboom234]

Pacific rim was a terrible movie no story no characters sure it looked pretty but it was stupid. Mad maxs marketing was ten times better and hopefully it is much better when I get around to watching it after finals

Edited May 17, 2015 by The Sun's Son

[Avatree]

Uh, that's hardly the problem with the comments sections under articles about this weekend box office lol.

Oh I know, the amount of sexism and homophobia is a little disturbing.

[Jandrew]

Theyre not updating on time, Keith Simanton writes like english is his 3rd language, and now BOM wont load me for me on ipad or iphone.

Its a TKO folks.

[grim22]

From HSX

 

[The Futurist]

Why do people keep calling the Mad Max films niche. The second and third were the 31st and 24th highest grossing films in their respective years. That's a pretty good sized hit and equates to something around 100-130m in today's environment. That's not niche.

 

Saying that they're niche is saying that Denzel Washington is a niche actor.

 

The Equalizer was the 31st biggest film of last year.

2 Guns was the 45th biggest film of 2013

Safe House and Flight were the 25th and 33rd biggest films of 2012

 

it s because most people have trouble thinking attendance numbers and adjusted grosses.

 

Your point is excellent and could t be repeated enough.

Edited May 17, 2015 by The Futurist

[kayumanggi]

From HSX

 

 

Wow.

[CoolioD1]

wtf there's a poltergeist remake?

[PDC1987]

From HSX

 

Like I said weeks ago, Tomorrowland is this year's John Carter.

[Avatree]

wtf there's a poltergeist remake?

catch up, slowcoach

[Wrath]

by Keith Simanton

Has he ever written for them? I don't know his name. Wheres Ray?

Gone. Moved on to greener pastures.

[BoxOfficeZ]

Like I said weeks ago, Tomorrowland is this year's John Carter.

 

I have to agree with this, so far Tomorrowland has nothing that makes it really stick out, nor has the marketing been impressive. 

[PDC1987]

I have to agree with this, so far Tomorrowland has nothing that makes it really stick out, nor has the marketing been impressive. 

Disney can take solace in its production cost being much smaller than JC's at least.

[La Binoche]

From HSX

 

 

How reliable is that? 

[Maxmoser3]

All Disney has shown about Tomorrowland was flashy made scenes and George Clooney(very brief)

[PDC1987]

How reliable is that? 

It's HSX.

 

They called at least $50 million and over $60 million possible OW for PP2.

[Maxmoser3]

Theyre not updating on time, Keith Simanton writes like english is his 3rd language, and now BOM wont load me for me on ipad or iphone.

Its a TKO folks.

he doesn't even fully explain about the movies he just explains each very brief

[La Binoche]

It's HSX.

 

They called at least $50 million and over $60 million possible OW for PP2.

Thanks. But I don't follow them -- who are they? People in the industry, fans with access to tracking, both?

[Mango]

Sitting down for the 7:30 Mad Max. Busy Sunday at the theater today.

[keysersoze123]

Tomorrowland needed great reviews to break out. Since its not getting them its doomed for sure.

[DAR]

Disney can take solace in its production cost being much smaller than JC's at least.

And they have AOU/SW/IO/Ant-Man/GD/Cinderella