grey ghost Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 4 minutes ago, Krissykins said: Have you got a medical condition? How do you manage on flights? Are you a nightmare to travel with? Lol It's an internet addiction thing but if i can use the internet during that 3 hours then that's another story. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Futurist Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 I don't see BR 2049 going all too well with GA. Movie is just too peculiar for its own good. We ll see. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eXtacy Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 Think Mad Max is the best comparison here, so would suggest 42m at quick glance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krissykins Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 I’m not going to see Blade Runner because I’ve not seen the original and I don’t have time to watch it this weekend. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peludo Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 1 hour ago, The Futurist said: I don't see BR 2049 going all too well with GA. Movie is just too peculiar for its own good. We ll see. Pretty agree. I adore the original Blade Runner, but if this new film is as complex as the first one, I do not see this making massive numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krissykins Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 Didn’t the first Blade Runner totally flop in cinemas first time round? Is this the most expensive sequel to a bomb ever? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aabattery Posted October 6, 2017 Author Share Posted October 6, 2017 I think 2049 is a lot easier to wrap your head around than the OG Blade Runner. We'll see I guess, but other than it's length I don't think it's that unappealing for the GA. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FantasticBeasts Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 Basically there is no numbers. Deadline messing around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a2k Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 (edited) Too early. Reminds me of SMH early numbers. 10=>13.5=>15+ Quote Based off early evening estimates, Alcon/Sony’s Blade Runner 2049 via Warner Bros. is looking at a Thursday night in the vicinity of $3.5M. As we always footnote on these uber-early estimates, that number can go higher or lower, but there’s a feeling that ticket sales could push to $4M by the end of tonight. Note, this evening forecast does not come from Warner Bros. Kingsman2 did 11.5x the previews over the ow. This one could do 11-13x. 4m previews give 44-52m ow with that multi. Edited October 6, 2017 by a2knet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmnerdjamie Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 More or less, yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a2k Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 Audience Score on RT starts of at 90%. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
75Live Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 2 hours ago, Krissykins said: I’m not going to see Blade Runner because I’ve not seen the original and I don’t have time to watch it this weekend. You really don't need to see the original. I won't say any more than that. After watching BR2049 last night, the original really isn't needed to get this one. Not saying don't watch the original, mind you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a2k Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 Just wanna throw it out there that as late as September few including me were thinking this one will be lucky to do 100m dom (in fact had it at 85 dom). Only off late have expectations raised to Mad Max numbers so we shouldn't be harsh on the film if it does less than 45 ow or something. Hoping the previews cross 4m at least. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonwo Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 5 hours ago, Krissykins said: Hmm this sounds like a strange deal. Why would WB pay for 4,000 locations to get 10%? Plus why would WB be interested? Anymore info on this anywhere? Because 10% is pretty standard. Paramount only got 8-9% on the Marvel movies and DWA films for example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookson Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 1 minute ago, Jonwo said: Because 10% is pretty standard. Paramount only got 8-9% on the Marvel movies and DWA films for example. Why would WB be listed as the main studio then? You'd think SONYs name would be all over this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krissykins Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 1 hour ago, 75Live said: You really don't need to see the original. I won't say any more than that. After watching BR2049 last night, the original really isn't needed to get this one. Not saying don't watch the original, mind you See, someone else said the opposite! I went into Mad Max blind anyway but I know they aren’t exactly known for plot lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krissykins Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 6 minutes ago, Jonwo said: Because 10% is pretty standard. Paramount only got 8-9% on the Marvel movies and DWA films for example. Maybe we’ll get a clearer picture from Deadline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
75Live Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 11 minutes ago, Krissykins said: See, someone else said the opposite! I went into Mad Max blind anyway but I know they aren’t exactly known for plot lol. can it help to have seen the original? yes it does, but I won't say why here, obviously. if you want to get "somewhat specific" without spoiling, you can PM me any questions, even if you want to be spoiled Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damianport1 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 This is going under 40. you heard it first Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 Hmm, maybe I should have stuck with 40M after all. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
