DMan7 Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 1 minute ago, AJG said: Yuck. No it doesn't. Yes it does kid, you better believe it! 😎 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronJimbo Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mojoguy Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 If Cavill thinks he can get a big pay raise and more creative control along with a Superman sequel. He won't. Especially not after Justice League floppage. Studios reward actors to get them successful movies, not movies that lose money. His Superman has never been that well liked. WB can sit back do nothing with the Superman character for the next 10 years if they want. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legion Again Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 50 minutes ago, IronJimbo said: 2020 Is this when WB will publically confirm Affleck and Cavill as out of the DCEU? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomCruiseTop Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 9 minutes ago, Thanos Legion said: Is this when WB will publically confirm Affleck and Cavill as out of the DCEU? Yeah, along with every other cape studio quitting after the return of the king. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatebox Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 13 minutes ago, Mojoguy said: If Cavill thinks he can get a big pay raise and more creative control along with a Superman sequel. He won't. Especially not after Justice League floppage. Studios reward actors to get them successful movies, not movies that lose money. His Superman has never been that well liked. WB can sit back do nothing with the Superman character for the next 10 years if they want. I think WB are smart enough to realise that Snyder was entirely to blame for... whatever the hell MoS and BvS were. No, Superman's future won't live and die on Cavil's involvement, but given he just had his first unqualified hit in M:I6 the timing could have perhaps been better. I think most people would have been perfectly happy giving him another shot at a decent solo film, but hey-ho. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mojoguy Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 Is this when WB will publically confirm Affleck and Cavill as out of the DCEU? WB can do what they did with Brandon Routh, basically sit back and do nothing until they are ready to announce a new Superman movie with new actor playing Superman. WB waited 3 years for Roth's contract to expire instead of firing him. They are basically doing the same thing with Affleck and Batman right now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJG Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 Quote HENRY CAVILL'SUPERMAN' CONFLICT IS FAKE!!! http://www.tmz.com/2018/09/13/henry-cavill-superman-warner-bros-money/ Quote Sources in the know tell TMZ, there's no real discussion over the main role because there's no active 'Superman' project. It's true ... Cavill has felt he was underpaid for the role and that's an issue, as is what some say was an underwhelming performance. We're told if and when the next 'Superman' project is greenlit, Cavill along with others would be in play. If, for example, a director felt he was the perfect guy for the role, he could end up with another cape assuming he and the studio could come to terms. Looks as if Henry Cavill’s people are sending stories to TMZ now. I wonder how WB will fight back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyK Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 1 hour ago, Mojoguy said: If Cavill thinks he can get a big pay raise and more creative control along with a Superman sequel. He won't. Especially not after Justice League floppage. Studios reward actors to get them successful movies, not movies that lose money. His Superman has never been that well liked. WB can sit back do nothing with the Superman character for the next 10 years if they want. I don't think it's about getting a pay rise, I think it's about getting another movie. They want him to do cameos with no solo planned. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Futurist Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 #Team_Green_Lantern_2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyK Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 Damn Thanos................ 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDarkKnightOfSteel Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 It’s so unfortunate to think that Grace Randolph makes sense to the point that you link her videos. Anyway,why the hell Cavill and his team would leak a story to TMZ that calls his performance underwhelming?I would say that if someone leaked this story is WB because they are getting so much shit since yesterday and it affects the entire universe since buzz is pretty bad right now and cries for DCEU being dead have never been louder. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legion Again Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 1 hour ago, AndyK said: Damn Thanos................ Not perfectly balanced — yet... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMan7 Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 1 hour ago, AndyK said: Damn Thanos................ That Thanos, he never does anything right. He forgot the 3 on the left. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChipDerby Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 If I was a betting man, I would put money on Cavill playing Superman at least one more time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMan7 Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, ChipMunky said: If I was a betting man, I would put money on Cavill playing Superman at least one more time. Yea as a 1 minute cameo in Shazam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozymandias Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 On September 12, 2018 at 1:47 PM, a2k said: el oh fucking el Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titan Man Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 Maybe WB just tried to scare Cavill with the whole story of him being fired so he would lower his expectations and demands, but in the end it backfired as we saw pretty clearly that people like him as Superman. I don't think he is done yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alli Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 (edited) If they don't plan to make a superman movie anytime soon, why did they announce Cavill's departure? could have said nothing and let the fans still hope. Edited September 13, 2018 by Alli 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnack Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Alli said: If they don't plan to make a superman movie anytime soon, why did they announce Cavill's departure? could have said nothing and let the fans still hope. Did they ?, I read the exact opposite of announcing departure, but a statue quo statement WB statement was: "We have a great relationship and great respect for Henry Cavill that continues to remain unchanged. Additionally we have made no current decisions regarding any upcoming Superman films," The article about them just tend to be filled with WB sources/person in the known statement in a article called WB response making it look like more official than they are. Edited September 13, 2018 by Barnack 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...