The Flash | June 16 2023 | Ezra Miller, Michael Keaton | We’re stoping the count at a Nice 69% RT (it’s 72% For Real) | Please Remember that Your Enjoyment Of The Film is Not Based On Others Opinions And To Be Nice To Each Other

[keysersoze123]

2 minutes ago, Brainbug said:

Am i the only one whos possible hype gets crushed every time i see Ezras face?

 

Sorry, this is just my personal opinion, but that person has eliminated any desire for me to see this.

That is the biggest question around this. We will know somethings later this evening once reactions are out and see if Presales for this matches the hype seen. My expectation is this needs to have stronger presales start than the other movie which I wont name in this thread releasing soon. 

 

I aint seeing this unless it gets TDK level of critical reception. I doubt this will get that level even if movie is very well made as I expect AM to do. 

[Dragoncaine]

I thought this was a great trailer with inconsistent CGI. That shot of Supergirl and both Flashes on the battlefield is horrendous, while other sequences look terrific. This trailer has a clear, compelling emotional hook too.

[Napoleon]

Great trailer, except for a few CGI shots. Love to see Ben Affleck back, he's always been my favorite Batman.

[Firepower]

First trailer was better and they hid most of bad CGI there.

[sabrecmc]

Idk, it just looks like a generic CBM for the most part, not the second coming they keep trying to say it is. Always good to see Keaton, though.  Ezra is just so unappealing, especially with everything in my head about him now...I have a hard time getting past that to see him as a hero character.

[Last Man Standing]

4 minutes ago, Brainbug said:

Am i the only one whos possible hype gets crushed every time i see Ezras face?

 

Sorry, this is just my personal opinion, but that person has eliminated any desire for me to see this.

The way I see it, he's just one guy, and hundreds of people worked on the movie, I don't like dismissing their work just because the movie has one psycho in it. I think it's totally reasonable to give it a miss because of Ezra though.

[CoolioD1]

this is on paper the nostalgia bait movie most directed at me so far but i really feel nothing.

[Seth Irskens]

Looking great! Last trailer was better but still liked this trailer too. Here's my reaction and review to the new trailer! 

 

[Cmasterclay]

This is releasing nearly 30 years to the day after Jurassic Park and that trailer is a compelling argument that CGI has actually gotten worse.

 

So ugly as sin I couldn't even pay attention to the rest of the content.

[TheDude391]

Similar to trailer 1, it seems it is being very well received among fans and audiences. 

[kayumanggi]

 

Edited April 25, 2023 by kayumanggi

[XXR vs XXR]

If this gets good reviews, I’ll see it in theaters. 

[ChipDerby]

15 minutes ago, Cmasterclay said:

This is releasing nearly 30 years to the day after Jurassic Park and that trailer is a compelling argument that CGI has actually gotten worse.

 

So ugly as sin I couldn't even pay attention to the rest of the content.

 

Curious how many CGI shots Jurassic Park had compared to Flash.

[SnokesLegs]

I like James Gunn and what he’s announced for the DCU so far, but even discarding my feelings of distaste about Miller (even before the myriad allegations, I couldn’t stand their ADD take on Barry), nothing about this screams “best CBM ever”, it looks very middle of the road and been-there-done-that in just about every way, from visuals to plot.

 

Barring an absolutely euphoric response from reviewers, this is still a pass for me.

[YM!]

16 minutes ago, Cmasterclay said:

This is releasing nearly 30 years to the day after Jurassic Park and that trailer is a compelling argument that CGI has actually gotten worse.

 

So ugly as sin I couldn't even pay attention to the rest of the content.

And I thought Quantumania was ugly lol. Why are these tentpoles looking uglier?

[BadOlCatSylvester]

Looks decent, but it really doesn't seem to deserving of even a sliver of the industry hype it's getting. The CGI in particular makes MODOK in Quantumania look like Thanos. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if the actual reviews are more in line with Aquaman than The Dark Knight. Thankfully this will be screening in full at CinemaCon in a few hours so we'll see what happens.

Edited April 25, 2023 by BadOlCatSylvester

[excel1]

Looks brilliant. 

[John Marston]

2 minutes ago, YM! said:

And I thought Quantumania was ugly lol. Why are these tentpoles looking uglier?

 

Probably because the FX artists are working on multiple projects for both TV and film at the same time so they can’t devote all their time to focusing on just one. 

[excel1]

Keaton and Affleck bring such gravitas. Their presence alone is insane. 

[Maggie]

It looks fantastic imo. Who cares about some wonky CGI, the casual viewer won't even notice. If that's all you're complaining about, looks to me you're grasping at straws to find a little flaw. Movie looks sick and it will make bank